
Code review is the process of evaluating source code written by another developer to ensure it meets quality, performance, security, and maintainability standards before it is merged into the main codebase. It helps improve software reliability while promoting collaboration and shared ownership across engineering teams.
Code reviews help identify issues early in the development lifecycle, reducing technical debt and preventing bugs from reaching production. Beyond improving quality, this practice reinforces consistent engineering standards and accelerates team learning.
Detects bugs, logic errors, vulnerabilities, duplicated logic, and style inconsistencies.
Encourages team involvement and collective responsibility for the codebase.
Exposes developers to new patterns, tools, and best practices through real examples.
Conducted using platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket with inline comments, history tracking, and approval workflows.
Quick, informal, in-person or screen-sharing sessions used for small or urgent changes.
Two developers write code together in real time, eliminating the need for post-development review in certain cases.
A developer contributes a feature and submits a pull request in GitHub. Team members add comments, discuss logic improvements, suggest style fixes, and approve the merge once feedback is addressed.
Broader Concepts:
Related Practices: