Data Forest logo
Home page  /  Glossary / 
Text Summarization

Text Summarization

Text summarization is a process in natural language processing (NLP) that condenses a lengthy text document into a shorter version while retaining the essential information and meaning. Text summarization aims to create a coherent and concise summary by identifying and emphasizing the core ideas within the original document. This task is essential for managing the vast amount of information generated in the digital age, where quick comprehension of key points is often required. Summarization can be broadly divided into two primary categories: *extractive summarization* and *abstractive summarization*, each employing distinct approaches and methods to generate summaries.

Key Types of Text Summarization

  1. Extractive Summarization: In extractive summarization, the model selects sentences or phrases directly from the original text to form a summary. This approach is based on ranking individual sentences according to their importance or relevance to the main theme, often without rephrasing. Extractive methods are generally simpler to implement and tend to retain grammatical correctness, as they use exact sentences from the original text. However, they may lack coherence since sentences are extracted without modification, sometimes resulting in a summary that is disjointed.
  2. Abstractive Summarization: Abstractive summarization generates summaries by interpreting and rephrasing the original content, allowing for greater flexibility and coherence. In contrast to extractive methods, abstractive summarization requires generating new sentences that represent the main ideas of the document rather than merely extracting them. This approach is more challenging and computationally demanding, as it involves paraphrasing and restructuring information, often leveraging deep learning techniques and advanced neural network architectures, such as sequence-to-sequence models or transformers.

Mathematical Representation of Summarization

The summarization process can be defined as follows: given an input text `X = {x_1, x_2, ..., x_n}`, where `x_i` represents each word or sentence in the document, the goal is to generate a summary `Y = {y_1, y_2, ..., y_m}`, where `m < n` and `Y` captures the essence of `X`.

The summarization objective function seeks to maximize the probability of the summary `Y` given the input `X`:

`P(Y | X) = Π P(y_i | X, y_1, y_2, ..., y_(i-1))`

In this expression:

  • `P(Y | X)` is the probability of the summary `Y` conditioned on the input `X`,
  • `P(y_i | X, y_1, ..., y_(i-1))` represents the probability of each token `y_i` in the summary based on previous tokens and the input, learned by the model during training.

Methods and Models in Text Summarization

Several approaches and models are commonly used in text summarization:

  1. Frequency-Based Methods: These traditional extractive techniques rely on word frequency to rank and select sentences with the highest occurrence of important terms. Techniques such as term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and graph-based methods like *TextRank*—a method similar to Google’s PageRank—identify the most important sentences based on word co-occurrence and network centrality within the document.
  2. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models:
    • Encoder-Decoder Models: Sequence-to-sequence models are widely used for abstractive summarization. In these models, the encoder processes the input text into a hidden state representation, and the decoder generates the summary based on this representation. The model aims to maximize the likelihood of generating a sequence of tokens that best represents the input text.      
    • Transformer-Based Models: Transformer models, particularly the Transformer’s *self-attention* mechanism, are foundational to modern summarization, as they allow models to capture dependencies across long text sequences. Popular transformer models for summarization include BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for extractive tasks and T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) and BART (Bidirectional and Auto-Regressive Transformer) for abstractive tasks.
  3. Attention Mechanisms: In summarization models, attention mechanisms allow the model to focus on important parts of the input when generating each word in the summary. In the attention mechanism, for each output token, the model assigns a weight to each input token based on relevance, facilitating the generation of a coherent summary that captures the main points from specific segments of the input.
  4. Reinforcement Learning: Reinforcement learning techniques are sometimes employed to optimize the generated summary's quality using a reward function that measures relevance, coherence, and readability. This is especially useful in abstractive summarization, where reinforcement learning can guide the model to generate summaries closer to human-written ones.

Evaluation Metrics for Summarization

Evaluating summarization quality involves several metrics that measure the similarity between the generated summary and a reference (or "gold-standard") summary:

  1. ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation): ROUGE is a set of metrics that measure overlapping n-grams, word sequences, and word pairs between the generated and reference summaries. ROUGE-N (e.g., ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2) calculates the overlap for unigrams, bigrams, etc., while ROUGE-L focuses on the longest common subsequence. Higher ROUGE scores indicate better similarity between the generated and reference summaries.
  2. BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy): Though primarily used for machine translation, BLEU can also evaluate summarization by calculating precision-based n-gram overlap between generated and reference summaries.
  3. METEOR (Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit ORdering): Like BLEU, METEOR measures word overlap but considers synonyms, stemming, and reordering, making it a useful metric for summarization tasks, particularly abstractive summaries.
  4. Perplexity and Human Evaluation: For abstractive summarization, measuring how "natural" the generated text sounds often requires human evaluation, as well as measuring *perplexity*, which reflects how well the model's output aligns with human language patterns.

Text summarization is widely applied in areas requiring quick comprehension of large documents, such as news summarization, legal document summarization, customer service (e.g., summarizing call transcripts), and academic research. It also plays an essential role in improving user experience in applications like search engines and recommendation systems, where concise and relevant summaries enable faster decision-making. Summarization models, especially those based on transformers and deep learning, continue to evolve, providing increasingly nuanced, coherent, and contextually aware summaries across domains.

Generative AI
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Latest publications

All publications
Article preview
February 14, 2025
13 min

E-Commerce Data Integration: Unified Data Across All Sales

Article image preview
February 14, 2025
19 min

Personalization and Privacy: Resolving the AI Dilemma in Insurance

Article image preview
February 14, 2025
17 min

Data Lake vs. Data Warehouse = Flexibility vs. Structure

All publications
top arrow icon